moreIts not our problem if you wanna drop money to those liars double faced executives at Apple for their hyped products.Įvery time they launch something, fanboys like you act as if they recreated the Universe. Also, the statement that a PC would be 'much noisier' is inaccurate-most builds can be near-silent with a decent fan setup and a simple fan curve.Īnonymous, You got to love those Apple Haters 🤦🏻‍♂️ They will simply hate even though they never owned or. Both of the builds I linked would be better than the 5900X/3060/32GB RAM computer in the article, and both cost less than the cheapest Mac Studio (while having twice as much RAM and four times the storage). Like the other build, this one has Arctic P12s and a high-airflow case.Īgain, I understand that Apple's CPUs have many advantages, but the PC configuration in the article is rather unoptimized in terms of getting the most performance per dollar. This has a significantly faster GPU compared to the PC from the article (~50-70% more performance than a 3060).

If you'd rather have more GPU horsepower, you could also get a computer with a 12700K, 3070 Ti, 64GB RAM, and 2TB of Gen4 NVMe storage for slightly less than the base-model Mac Studio (). In the linked parts list, I've included a 5-pack of Arctic's P12 PWM PST fans since we don't want the machine to be 'much noisier' than the Mac Studio. This gets you four cores/eight threads more and twice as much RAM as the PC mentioned in the article.

I agree that Apple's M1 processors are great in many areas, but I disagree with this statement from the article: 'A quick check online shows that we could've built a Ryzen 9 5900X machine with a 12GB Nvidia RTX 3060 and 32GB of RAM for slightly less than the Mac Studio.'įor $160 less than the base-model Mac Studio, you can get a PC with a 5950X, 6600 XT, 64GB RAM, and 2TB of Gen4 NVMe storage ().

Davinci resolve mac vs pc